When Speaking Up Changes How You’re Seen
A reflection on ownership, timing, and unintended labels
Have you ever noticed how speaking up about what’s broken in an organization can slowly change how you’re seen, not because you are wrong, but because you are saying it before people are ready to hear it? What begins as an attempt to act like an owner, to protect the long-term health of the organization, can quietly turn into a reputation issue. You are no longer just someone raising concerns. You are “that person.” The one who sees too much. The one who speaks too much.
What amuses me is how thin that line really is. Stay quiet for too long and you risk being seen as checked out, as someone who doesn’t really care, or worse, a “yes-man”.
Speak up too often and suddenly you are no longer heard the way you were.
Commitment starts to sound like negativity. Caring starts to look like complaining.
We often say we want leaders who think like owners and speak their mind. Owners versus renters, we say. But in practice, that honesty is usually welcome only in small doses, and sometimes when it fits into what the organization is already comfortable hearing. If you don’t point out where culture or structure is quietly breaking down, you might be seen as someone who doesn’t have a complete view of the organization. But if you do point it out, there’s a good chance you could be seen as negative, or as someone pushing a personal agenda, even when you are genuinely trying to help and offering real ways forward.
I have also learned that a lot depends on who you are talking to. Not every leader naturally looks at organizations through a design lens. If someone hasn’t spent time building organizations, structural misalignments can feel trivial to them. In the same way, if you raise revenue concerns with a leader who mainly looks inward, they may struggle to see what you are worried about. It’s not always resistance. Sometimes it’s just different ways of seeing the organization.
I also have to admit that I’ve been on the other side of this. I’ve caught myself doing the same thing, quietly labeling someone as “too focused on problems,” especially when the timing felt off or the message was hard to deal with. Not because they were wrong, but because really engaging with it would have meant slowing down, or changing course when it felt easier to just keep moving. I don’t think that makes us bad leaders. Okay, maybe it does. But more often than not, I think it just makes us human.
I wish I could say I’ve figured out a perfect way to know when to speak up, what to say, how to say it, and who to say it to. I haven’t. What I usually do instead is say something, watch how it is received, and adjust. I pay attention to whether the response is curious or defensive. Over time, you start to sense what the organization, or your leadership, can deal with, and what it’s just not ready to hear yet.
What weighs on me most isn’t my own uncertainty. It’s how often I’ve seen good leaders pay a price for trying to fix organizational problems. People who genuinely cared and wanted to belong. People who weren’t trying to score points or had an agenda. They spoke up because they believed in the company and ended up paying for it. That feels deeply unfair and, honestly, a bit sad.
I wish it wasn’t this hard to care out loud.
Organizations should be able to have uncomfortable conversations without turning the person raising them into the problem. Until that happens, speaking up will keep feeling like a credibility risk.
Maybe leadership, is learning how to live with that risk. How to speak clearly without making yourself the problem. How to keep caring even when it might cost you your credibility. And maybe wisdom isn’t about knowing exactly when to speak, but about sensing how much truth the moment, and the person across the table, can really take.
And if they prove, over and over again, that they are not ready to hear the truth, then exiting, unfortunately, is an option. Hopefully, that opens the door to finding a tribe that can hear both the positive and the negative without judging you too harshly.
Lead Better
Subscribe to get essays that go beyond surface-level tactics and challenge how you think about engineering leadership, building teams, and leading with intention.